The Budget Session of Parliament had 30 sittings which were divided in two parts; the first part consisted of 7 sittings, and the second part of 23 sittings. * This was the least productive Budget Session for both Houses since 2000. This session also witnessed notice to move a no-confidence motion against the government.
Least productive Budget Session since 2000; No confidence motion not admitted in Lok Sabha
|
Least amount of time spent by both Houses on debating the Budget since 2000…
Note: Debate on the Budget includes discussion on the Union Budget, the Railways Budget (merged with Union Budget since 2017), the Finance Bill, and Demand for Grants of various ministries. |
|
…and 100% of the demand for grants passed without discussion
|
Poorest performance of Question Hour in Lok Sabha since 2014
|
1% of productive time spent on legislative business in Lok Sabha; 6% in Rajya Sabha
- At the beginning of the session, 32 Bills were listed for consideration and passage, and 8 were listed for introduction, consideration and passing.
- Of these, the Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Bill, 2018 was passed by Parliament and the Specific Relief (Amendment) Bill 2017 was passed by Lok Sabha, without discussion. Further, two Bills were introduced in Lok Sabha. These were the Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, 2018 and the Chit Funds (Amendment) Bill, 2018.
- Rajya Sabha spent 2 hours and 31 minutes discussing legislative business. However, just 3 minutes of this time was spent discussing government Bills, with the remaining time spent on Private Members’ Bills. On the other hand, Lok Sabha spent 19 minutes discussing legislative business. Of this, 14 minutes were spent in passing two government Bills, with no discussion on Private Members’ Bills.
Lowest number of discussions on matters of public importance since 2014
Note: Data includes discussion under Rule 193, Rule 176, Calling Attention, and Motion of Thanks. |
|
Data sources: Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha websites as on April 6, 2018.
* Lok Sabha cancelled one sitting due to the death of a sitting member. It had 29 sittings.
DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information. You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”). The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s). PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete. PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group. This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.