State of State Finances: 2024-25

In 2023-24, states’ own revenue (as percentage of GDP) was comparable to levels seen in 2018-19.  However, total revenue receipts continue to be lower than in 2018-19 due to declining central transfers.  There has been a marginal increase in states’ capital outlay, helped by long-term loans given by the Centre.  States’ revenue from SGST in 2023-24 exceeded pre-pandemic levels.  Mineral rich states can also raise additional revenue from mining post a Supreme Court judgement.  On the expenditure side, several states are implementing cash transfer schemes for women.  In addition, they may also have to incur additional expenditure if they switch to the unified pension scheme.  Poor financial conditions of state-owned discoms continue to present challenges to state finances.                 

In this backdrop, this report analyses the finances of all states and Union Territories of Delhi, Jammu and Kashmir, and Puducherry, based on their budget documents and CAG accounts.  The following abbreviations have been used for states in the charts throughout the report.

State

Abbreviation

State

Abbreviation

State

Abbreviation

Andhra Pradesh

AP

Jammu and Kashmir

JK

Puducherry

PY

Arunachal Pradesh

AR

Karnataka

KA

Rajasthan

RJ

Assam

AS

Kerala

KL

Sikkim

SK

Bihar

BR

Meghalaya

MG

Tamil Nadu

TN

Chhattisgarh

CG

Maharashtra

MH

Tripura

TR

Delhi

DL

Manipur

MN

Telangana

TS

Goa

GA

Madhya Pradesh

MP

Uttarakhand

UK

Gujarat

GJ

Mizoram

MZ

Uttar Pradesh

UP

Himachal Pradesh

HP

Nagaland

NL

West Bengal

WB

Haryana

HR

Odisha

OD

 

 

Jharkhand

JH

Punjab

PB

 

 

 

Contents

Section

Developing Themes in State Finances

     State finances in post COVID period

     Discretion with states over revenue and expenditure

     Trends in GST revenue

     Implementation of unified pension scheme

     Cash transfer schemes for women

     Grants for centrally sponsored schemes    

     Finance commission grants for local bodies

     Revenue from minerals

     Performance of power distribution companies

Trends in State Finances

    i.  Receipt

   ii.  Expenditure

   iii. Debt and Deficit

   iv. Credibility of Budget Estimates

  v.  Trends in Sector-wise Outlay

Annexure

Glossary of Key Terms

 

DISCLAIMER: This document is being furnished to you for your information.  You may choose to reproduce or redistribute this report for non-commercial purposes in part or in full to any other person with due acknowledgement of PRS Legislative Research (“PRS”).  The opinions expressed herein are entirely those of the author(s).  PRS makes every effort to use reliable and comprehensive information, but PRS does not represent that the contents of the report are accurate or complete.  PRS is an independent, not-for-profit group.  This document has been prepared without regard to the objectives or opinions of those who may receive it.


DEVELOPING THEMES IN STATE FINANCES

States’ own revenue revives while deficit levels increase marginally post-COVID

Revenue receipts of states declined between 2018-19 and 2020-21 due to economic slowdown in 2019-20, followed by the COVID-19 pandemic.  This led to an increase in borrowings and states’ total liabilities increased to 31% of GDP in 2020-21.  Since then, own revenue receipts of states have revived back to pre-COVID level, and debt levels have decreased.

States have limited discretion in raising revenue and planning expenditure

Around 60% of the overall government expenditure in the country is through state budgets.  However, states enjoy limited discretion in raising revenue and planning expenditure.  In 2022-23, 53% of their receipts came from non-discretionary sources.  On the expenditure side, around 55% of the expenditure was largely inflexible in nature.

Revenue from SGST in 2023-24 above pre-COVID levels

In 2023-24, the total SGST revenue of states overtook the levels seen in 2018-19.  RBI noted that SGST revenue has benefitted from revival in economic activity and improved tax administration.  The GST Council has formed a Group of Ministers to consider replacing the compensation cess.  Currently, cess is being utilised to pay back loans taken to cover shortfall in compensation during COVID. Thus, both Centre and states stand to gain revenue if the compensation cess is subsumed within GST slabs.

Shifting to Unified Pension Scheme could involve additional expenditure for states

In August 2024, the Union Cabinet approved the Unified Pension Scheme for its employees.  The scheme seeks to provide assured pension to central government employees with an increase in government contribution under the scheme.  States that choose to implement UPS for their employees may have to incur additional expenditure.

Several states are implementing cash transfer schemes for women

In 2024-25, nine states are estimated to cumulatively spend over one lakh crore rupees on implementing cash transfer schemes for women.  These states include Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, and West Bengal.  Impact on the budget varies across states.  Implementing cash transfer schemes can improve consumption capacity of the beneficiaries.

Per capita grants under centrally sponsored schemes lower for some poorer states

Since 2015-16, central grants for CSS have formed over 20% of total central transfers.  These schemes are designed by the Centre and implemented by states.  They aim to ensure minimum standards of public services across states.  Average per capita CSS grants have been lower for some poorer states such as Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.  States with lower fiscal and implementation capacity face challenges in implementing these schemes.

States can raise additional revenue from minerals post Supreme Court judgement

In July 2024, the Supreme Court upheld the power of states to tax mineral rights.  It also allowed states to recover retrospective demands from such levies.  States can gain additional revenue from imposing levies on minerals.

Discom losses increase driven by higher power purchase costs

Losses incurred by state-owned discoms doubled in 2022-23 over the previous year.  This was driven by an increase in power purchase costs due to increased dependence on imported coal and an increase in price of imported coal.  Persistent losses could hinder investments in upgrading electricity distribution infrastructure.

Read More..